Governance of Islamic Financial Institutions

Are Shari’a Boards the only Institutions with a Role?

 

by Akhtar Hamid, Lead Counsel, The World Bank.  The views expressed in this paper are entirely the author’s, and do not necessarily represent those of the World Bank

 

Introduction

Recent developments suggest

qGovernance of Islamic Financial Institutions (IsFIs) be seen in much broader terms than just Shari’a Boards

qSeveral possible Shari’a-based institutions with a potential for impacting IsFIs, directly or indirectly

qShari’a Boards are only a small, though critical, sub-set

Introduction Continued…

 

Remarks address issues going beyond Shari’a Boards alone

qDraw generalizations and lessons from recent developments in Pakistan

qAccept that (a) discussions in Pakistan have not concluded yet, and (b) developments in other countries may take a different turn

qTherefore should be seen as raising “possibilities” rather than stating “definitive positions”

qHope will help put role of Shari’a Boards in perspective and promote better understanding of it

 

Introduction Continued…

Cover following topics

q Shape and Depth of Governance Structure

q Elements of Governance Structure

q Responsibilities of Shari’a-based Governance Institutions

q Qualifications of Shari’a-based Governance Institutions

q Merits and Demerits of Shari’a-based Governance Institutions

Shape and Depth of Governance Structure

ŻDetermined by type of underlying financial system

qMixed”, i.e., partly Shari’a-based, partly conventional

qExclusive”, i.e., entirely Shari’a-based

qUndecided” or “Wavering”, i.e., in a state of transition somewhere in between the “mixed” and “exclusive” systems

 

Shape and Depth of Governance Structure

ŻVaries in complexity

qRelatively simple under the “mixed” system

qFar more complex under the “exclusive” system

qEven more complicated in the “wavering” or “undecided” state

Elements of Governance Structure

May include

q a Shari’a Board specifically so called, within the central bank or IsFIs themselves

qA national Shari’a Council

qA national Shari’a Court

qA national legislature

qA central bank

qA specific Shari’a committee or commission (or a series of them)

Elements of Governance Structure

May exist in various permutations and combinations depending on type of financial system

Emergence of several Shari’a-based governance institutions at the same time or in rapid succession may lead to

qFragmented responsibility

qOverlapping jurisdictions and turf warfare

Elements of Governance Structure

Their unnecessary proliferation be guarded against, and if a number of them do emerge, a clear delineation of their responsibilities is essential

Responsibilities of Shari’a-Based Governance Institutions

Undertake a several part exercise to legislate a policy and legal framework for a Shari’a-based banking/financial system

qAs part of the Executive

qAs part of the Legislature

qAs part of the Superior Judiciary

qAs part of IsFIs

Responsibilities of Shari’a-Based Governance Institutions

Address difficult theological and other questions (e.g., on nature of “riba” or “interest”)

qDiscover and give effect to relevant Shari’a rule

qConduct elaborate research, needing expert services and time

qChart a course between different schools of thought

Responsibilities of Shari’a-Based Governance Institutions

Questions especially difficult where financial system moving from a conventional to a Shari’a-based system

 

Qualifications of Shari’a-Based Governance Institutions

Personnel of Shari’a-based governance institutions obviously need to

qBe thoroughly conversant with the Quran, the “hadith” and the “sunnah”, as well as ancient and traditional Islamic commentaries

qHave ready access to the view of contemporary Islamic scholars, economists, bankers, lawyers and other experts

qBe fitted for their work by training, experience and background in theology, law and finance

qIn particular, represent all major Islamic schools of thought

 

Qualifications of Shari’a-Based Governance Institutions

Persons trained and qualified in all these fields not easy to find in large numbers to man several Shari’a-based governance institutions at the same time

qUnless a long tradition exists of providing such training, together with the necessary institutional structure

qWhich is not likely to be the case especially where the system is “transitioning” or “wavering”

Merits and Demerits of Shari’a-Based Governance Institutions

A Shari’a Board so named, or a Shari’a Council or a specific Shari’a committee or commission

qCan be properly equipped to do its work

qUnless otherwise lacks merit, can be counted on to produce satisfactory work products

Merits and Demerits of Shari’a-Based Governance Institutions

A Shari’a court not an ideal forum for laying down broad new principles or guidelines

qCannot be seen to be openly making new law

qLimited to conflicting arguments presented by two or more parties, and the narrow points of law and fact upon which they are based

qDecision always subject to review in the next case, or by a higher court

qLimited in terms of numbers

qLimited in terms of time

qIn certain circumstances very existence precarious at best

Conclusions

vThe shape and character of Shari’a-based governance institutions is determined largely by the type of the underlying financial system; if that system is in a state of flux, the search for the right mix of governance institutions can be endless

vGovernance institutions can belong to any branch of government – executive, legislature and/or judiciary, apart from the banking sector proper

Conclusions (continued)

vIf not guarded against, they have a tendency to proliferate unnecessarily, with a risk of leading to fragmented responsibility, overlapping jurisdictions and turf warfare

vThey have a difficult task of discovering and applying oftentimes obscure rules of theology, in a manner acceptable to the rank and file of stakeholders

Conclusions (continued)

vIt may not always be an easy job of finding sufficient numbers of qualified persons to man large numbers of such governance institutions

vApart from the right sort of membership, they need access to all manner of source and plenty of time to do an effective job of laying down broad guidelines for stakeholders’ benefit

vFrom that point of view, some of such governance institutions are better placed than others to fulfill their mandate, the case of Shari’a courts are being particularly noteworthy in this connection